Stroke, clot risk halved in patients with heart disease and arrhythmia who took blood thinners apixaban versus rivaroxaban
A difference in the effectiveness against strokes and other blood clots was easily visible in the first year among patients who’d taken the anticoagulant apixaban rather than rival rivaroxaban, according to researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
In the “emulated” clinical trial—an analysis comparing matched patients in a large health insurance database—all of the patients whose data were analyzed were those who have atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated valvular heart disease (VHD). Each patient took one form of an anticoagulant, also known as blood thinners, to slow down the formation of new blood clots and help avoid existing clots from growing larger and potentially more harmful. The study showed that those who took apixaban had their dangerous clot risk decrease almost by half compared with rivaroxaban.
At least several million Americans have AF, a type of irregular heartbeat that led to blood clots in the heart, and it is thought that more than 60 percent of these patients have associated VHD, which essentially means that they also have significant heart valve damage. Stroke or systemic embolism risk increase by several times in those with AF compared to those without it, and VHD is suspected of adding to the risk of stroke or death.
Since 2016, apixaban and rivaroxaban have been the most prescribed anticoagulants for reducing stroke and systemic embolism risk in AF/VHD patients. While some traditional blood thinners can be affected by a patient’s diet, apixaban and rivaroxaban do not, making them easier to manage. But, so far, there have been no clinical trials directly comparing the two drugs in this patient population.
Almost 10,000 patients who had recently started taking apixaban were compared with another 10,000 newly taking rivaroxaban. The study was not of the clinical trial type, in which patients are randomly assigned to different groups to minimize differences between them. Rather, the researchers emulated a clinical trial by matching each patient in the apixaban group to one in the rivaroxaban group with similar age and other characteristics that could affect outcomes. The patient records compared in the study came from a large commercial health insurance database with de-identified data from 2013 to 2020.
The number of strokes, as well as blood clots in the body other than the brain (called “systemic embolisms”) in the patients seen over the span of several years after they began taking the medications suggested that patients in the apixaban group had a 43 percent lower risk of a clotting event, and a 49 percent lower risk of a gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding event.
The analysis showed that the numbers of patients who had strokes or systemic emboli in each group diverged almost immediately. Patients in the rivaroxaban group had markedly more of these events at six months and twelve months of follow-up. The researchers calculated that the rate of stroke or systemic embolism per patient per year of follow-up was about one percent (0.91 percent) for rivaroxaban users, and about half that (0.52 percent) for apixaban users. Similarly, the rate of bleeding events in the rivaroxaban group was about double that in the apixaban group.
